« Goal-Setting: The 90-Day Challenge | Main | Mac Quest: Contemplating the Switch »

Sunday, January 09, 2005

Mac Envy

I used to see Mac users as a kind of religious cult. They seemed to be committed to their alternative technology despite the fact that they had lost the computer wars. I argued that anything that was available on the Mac was now also available on a Windows PC. Simple economics dictate that developers are going to write software for the largest installed hardware base, right? I even predicted that innovation would dry up on the Mac as developers abandoned this doomed platform. Well, maybe not.

The first thing that made me start doubting my position was the Apple iPod. I bought my first one two years ago when it first came out. I loved it. Simple, elegant, and very cool. I thought, Maybe this is why the Macophiles are so zealous about their machines. Since that time, I have bought a few more iPods for my daughters. I even upgraded mine after the first one was lost. (My wife still thinks I lost it on purpose. I’m sticking to my original story.) I am still impressed by this device. It’s a joy to use.

When my daughter, Mary, was preparing to leave for college this past fall, to my own surprise, I recommended that she consider getting a Mac laptop. Startled, she looked at me and exclaimed, “Dad, are you kidding me? I thought you hated Macs!”

I was a little embarrassed, like a religious inquirer who was suddenly accused of being an actual convert. Yikes. Not so fast. I’m not one of them! Regardless, I bought a Mac PowerBook G4 for Mary and spent a few delicious hours getting her e-mail and printer set-up. Just like the iPod, it was a delight to use.

I thought, This is fine for Mary, but there’s no way I can even consider switching. For starters, I have too big of an investment in PC software. But I could tell my defenses were breaking down. Nevertheless, I honestly didn’t think about it again. Until today.

This morning after church, I went to a Board Meeting for a new startup company called The Orthodox Project. Joel Smith, my good friend and the entrepreneur who started the company, made a presentation on a Mac, using a package from Apple called Keynote. Oh my gosh! Have you seen this?

I am not easily impressed, especially by anything that resembles PowerPoint. Even though I use the software extensively, I sometimes wonder if we would be better off if PowerPoint was banned from corporate meetings. The bullets and transitions are so predictable. They often end up as a substitute for genuine thinking. Like someone said to me in a meeting last week, “Start-up a PowerPoint presentation and the average IQ of the room drops by 10 points.” I’m afraid he might be right.

But Keynote is different. First starters, the slides are beautiful. The rendering of the type is extraordinary, like a high-quality printed piece. (I since learned that this is a function of Mac OS X.) The transitions were especially cool, graceful, and seamless. The closest thing I have seen to this is PowerPlug Transitions, but it has always seemed a little too self-conscious, like too much cologne or a drum track that is too loud. Keynote’s transitions on the other hand are elegant and understated. This is what the main screen looks like:

KeyNote

I asked Joel if Apple made a version for Windows, like they did with iTunes. He said he didn’t think so. Still, I left the meeting hoping he was wrong. Unfortunately, he wasn’t. I went to Apple’s Web site as soon as I got home. If you want to get a quick feel for how this software leapfrogs PowerPoint, take a look at the winners of Keynote’s recent design contest.

This is the first software that has made me seriously consider buying a Mac for myself. No, I’m not ready to switch computers. I do have too big an investment—both in software and know-how—to consider switching. But I just might be able to justify buying a Mac for presentations. In my job, I make lots of them, so it might just be worth it. As you can tell, the process of rationalizing the purchase has already begun.

Postscript. If you know of a serious alternative to PowerPoint that will allow me to upgrade my presentations on a PC platform, please let me know.

January 9, 2005 at 07:53 PM in Cool Software | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/24762/1649974

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mac Envy:

» On switching from PC to Mac from Lifehacker
Publishing company president and weblogger Michael Hyatt recently replaced his PC with a Mac, and he's got some interesting insights into the process. Hyatt's experience isn't an Apple "switch" ad, it's a real person making a huge workflow transition. ... [Read More]

Tracked on Feb 25, 2005 1:46:07 PM

Comments

Michael - take the plunge. You will never regret the switch and will curse yourself for waiting so long. I was holding out for years myself. Finally, I had enough (another Windows upgrade that went bad) and just took the plunge. I sold the PC stuff I could and I have never looked back. (And I had, PC, Laptop, PDA, and all the software)

Really - it's night and day, pal. The Mac is sooo much more pleasant to use and trouble free. I did not even realize the trouble that the PC and Windows gave me until I had the Mac experience.

Make it a New Year's gift to yourself....You are too fine a writer to be held back by inferior stuff.

Posted by: Lisa Haneberg | Jan 9, 2005 10:06:15 PM

I just posted about this on my blog (I work for Microsoft) so I imagine you'll get some ideas today.

I posted a couple, albeit the Ventuz software is probably gonna be too difficult to deal with for everyday presentations. They are starting a beta soon, though, so we'll know more.

http://www.ventuz.com/solutions/showcase.aspx# has samples.

Posted by: Robert Scoble | Jan 10, 2005 5:50:51 AM

Michael,

After twenty years of working on MS based machines, going all the way back to my TI-PC, I changed to a PowerBook G4 two years ago. What an amazing difference this has made for me! So, I understand the temptation completely, and the hesitation. It's more than a change of hardware-software, it's actually more fundamental than that. Good luck in your thinking about your relationship with technology.

Posted by: Tom Guarriello | Jan 10, 2005 6:22:54 AM

Robert, thanks for the info on Ventuz. I signed up for the beta. It looks interesting -- and complex. That's one of the things that really impressed me about KeyNote. It looked very simple to use but the results were stunning.

I do have ClearType on and tweaked. It's still not close to what I saw on the Mac -- but then again, I'm a book publisher by trade and a bit of a nut when it comes to type. ;-)

Posted by: Michael Hyatt | Jan 10, 2005 6:33:35 AM

I'm a long-time bi-platform computer geek with a wide background (studied English literature, ended up working as a Web developer/designer on everything from front-end designs to backend database systems) and I continue to use both PCs and Macs every day.

I think that there are two kinds of delight a long-time PowerPoint user gets by looking at KeyNote for the first time. First, it's delightful because it's elegant, understated, and easy to use. Also, fonts are rendered on the Mac in ways that PC dreamers can only dream of, which you've already mentioned. This will remain true ad infinitum, and frankly, this is pretty much true about everything you use on the Mac. Second--and this is where I accidentally defend PowerPoint a little--it's fresh because it's just so different. If everyone in the world used KeyNote, it wouldn't look fresh any more. It would, however, still look absolutely beautiful (as a default), which PowerPoint cannot do without major tweaking. (It may sound funny, but the thing I was most impressed with wasn't even the transitions. It was the way Keynote handles charts. They're centered correctly, the labels are all the right size and shape, and the color schemes are clear and attractive. I can't say that about the charts PowerPoint generates.)

Listen, there are some things that you use on your PC that won't work the same way on a Mac. First and foremost, you won't be able to find the plugin you use to tweak Outlook into a GTD management tool. This may be a deal-breaker by itself, in terms of you being able to make a full switch.

But I know a lot of people who have a Mac lying around the office that they use essentially as a media-management tool--for music, photos, movies, and (of course) for presentations. An iBook is perfectly reasonable, and I'll wager that you'd find yourself gravitating to it more and more every day. In this way, if you ever do decide to make a full switch, the transition would be natural and seamless.

And there's a whole world of gadgets and widgets out there that make owning and using a Mac a pleasure. Not the least of which is something quite new: QuickSilver. I can't even begin to explain what QuickSilver is and how it enhances my productivity. All I can say is, all day at work on my PC, I'm dreaming of getting back on my Mac so I can use it.

Posted by: jeremy | Jan 10, 2005 9:32:09 AM

If you really want that "wow" effect, then check out a new Keynote TecTile theme: http://www.keynotethemepark.com/

Posted by: swissfondue | Jan 10, 2005 10:08:49 AM

I also switched, (and am also a huge QuickSilver fan). However I own a presentation company, and yet I still reccomend PowerPoint, there are a few reasons for this, but basically, blaming PowerPoint for bad presentations is like blamming the pan for bad food, it's how you use it that count.

Lose the bullets and transitions for starters, even when they're nice (especially when) they only serve to distract the audience from the message (YOU are the message). Never more than 6 words per slide if you can help it too.

Switch to macs regardless, I did, and it was the best move I ever made (sorry Robert).

And if you'd like to read more free simple thoughts on presentations, you can at www.attentionspam.com

Happy switching...!

Posted by: Rich...! | Jan 10, 2005 11:38:35 AM

You may have a cheap opportunity for a mac as a second computer soon (see link):

http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0412expo2.html

Posted by: Michael | Jan 10, 2005 12:16:22 PM

That same "user experience" of the iPod is the way all Apple products are - just the nature of the beast. I was never into Macs either, using Windows (early on) or Linux/Solaris/Irix (later on)... Finally buying a Mac when Mac OS X came out.

Honestly? It's made a Mac user out of me in a big way. I love my Macs (yes, plural) and would probably never switch back (as far as desktops go certainly).

You tasted what's out there with your iPods and your daughter's PowerBook. Get one for yourself and I'm sure you'll be quite pleased.

Thank you for writing an honest, upfront piece.

Posted by: Michael | Jan 10, 2005 3:04:09 PM

Wait'll you see the new version of Keynote tomorrow!

I switched a couple of years ago, and have been using Keynote for the many presentations I do. I've often been asked, after a talk, how did you *do* that?!? (These people are invariably PC users who didn't know of the existence of Keynote). However, as one of the previous posters said, you content is always more important than the eye-candy, and Keynote's stunning transitions can be distracting if overused.

PowerPoint has come a long way since Apple released Keynote (see what Microsoft can do when they have some competition?), and is, in many ways a more powerful piece of software. Keynote leapfrogged PowerPoint when it appeared in the presentation software universe, but PowerPoint is catching up and Keynote is still an immature package.

However, the consensus among the rumour mongers is that Apple will be announcing a new Office suite tomorrow, and included in this 'iWork' package will be a new version of Keynote. I have every confidence that the geniuses at Apple will have evolved their presentation software by another quantum, and it will leave PowerPoint in the dust.

I have several presentations to make in the next few months, and I'm eager to buy Keynote 2, and experiment with whatever new tools it may offer.

Cheers

Posted by: Bryan Crawford | Jan 10, 2005 4:14:00 PM

Hello there all -

I've been a silent reader of this blog for a long time now - and am very grateful for the opportunities Michael has given all of us to think creatively about how to improve our working lives.

I am - full disclosure here - a total Macintosh fundamentalist. I have plenty of PC experience, but the truth is I've never felt comfortable trusting my data / hard work to such an unreliable/unstable platform. This statement usually drives my PC friends batty and I know it sounds extreme. Even if I'm wrong about the security and stability of Windows, though, Mac OS X is Unix, the gold standard of both stability and security.

Despite my long-term attachment to the Mac, the switchers' comments here have led me to believe one thing I never quite understood before:

Those of us interested in improving our productivity - working smarter - should seriously consider Macs as essential time-savers. Put simply, whatever you're doing "just works" much more often on the Mac. No tweaking, plug-n-play, right out of the box, it just works. That's how they're designed. Sure, PCs have come a long way on this front, etc., but adding up the value of the time spent in a month trying to get the computer to "just do what I want" makes the Mac choice a no-brainer.

FYI, Michael, the Keynote transitions also are largely based on Mac OS X technology, and so are available in just about every Mac program. Also, have you heard about AppleScript? It's an incredible resource for anyone who wants to "template" repetitive office tasks - and there is no equivalent on the PC platform. And enthusiasts like myself are waiting for Automator, a graphical front-end to AppleScript which makes office automation a matter of of pointing and clicking. (It's coming in the next release of OS X, Tiger.)

Furthermore, you can run all of your PC software with your Macintosh peripherals on your Mac with Virtual PC. It's slow, but it works - you can even copy and paste to and from a Windows program and a Mac program. Heck, it's worth it. When it's time to upgrade the program, just buy the Mac version. It's probably better, and has more interesting features, than the Windows version. Ever used MS Word for Mac? It's fantastic.

Just my $0.02, and am waiting eagerly for tomorrow's announcements!

Posted by: Mark J. Harris | Jan 10, 2005 5:08:11 PM

SWITCH... you won't regret it... I won't re-hash all the points already made, they're ALL good (inlcuding the point about blaming PowerPoint is like blaming a pan for bad food)... it's just a tool... but all tools aren't created equal, and Keynote is just the tip of the ice-berg. I'm a long time PC user who's been on a Mac for a few years now... already on my third unit (now a Powerbook)... It's amazing how little I miss Windows... I have MS Office, and other than that, I've found that the native Mac OS apps cover everything else, far better than any options I had in Windows...

Posted by: Spencer | Jan 10, 2005 5:24:35 PM

Michael -
After working with PC's for the more than 15 years I made the switch exactly one year ago for my home system. I absolutely love it. Going to work to use my ThinkPad is just not the same. The user expereince falls short, the technical issues are greater. I made the switch out of the desire to not have to be an IT person at home as well as at work, but it is so much more than that now. I hope you give it a shot! You will not be disappointed.

Posted by: Austin White | Jan 10, 2005 9:14:54 PM

I am a software developer and a longtime Windows / Mac / UNIX user. It's just beyond me that so many version 1 Apple software such as Keynote and Safari simply blow decade old MS products out of water, even disregarding the fact that Apple spends far less R&D dollars on software than industrial design and hardware engineering, while MS does virtually nothing but software and is 10 or 20 times bigger than Apple.

I had used PowerPoint quite a bit over many years, but it never felt natural somehow. In contrast, Keynote is inspiring, not only because it looks so appealing, but also due to its conceptual clarity. Within a few short hours using Keynote, I learnt more about how to make presentation than I had done for years using PowerPoint!

Another good example of Apple's ability to make innovative software is Motion http://www.apple.com/motion/ which looks vastly more powerful than Ventuz and simpler to use.

Posted by: Robert Lee | Jan 10, 2005 9:30:05 PM

Your Mac Quest article has no comment section, so I have to post it here about the VPN issue.

Mac OS X has built-in VPN client, and works at least for me reliably over a Windows network, and there are also many other Mac OS X VPN client apps on Version Tracker.


Posted by: Robert Lee | Jan 10, 2005 10:06:29 PM

Hi,

I hope this doesn't sound too pedantic, but the software in question is "Keynote" not "KeyNote" -- and Quicksilver is mentioned in the comments, which also does not have InterCaps (i.e. Quicksilver, not QuickSilver).

Just trying to save folks a few unneeded presses on the Shift key. :)

Posted by: someone | Jan 10, 2005 10:16:25 PM

Might wanna read this blog entry for someone else's take on switching from Mac back to wintel.
http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/003868.html

Posted by: tz | Jan 10, 2005 10:26:17 PM

I never believed those iPod "Halo" effect ideas that were floating around the web/blogosphere a year or so ago but now I keep reading stories like this and I'm starting to believe. This makes thought provoking reading even if you don't switch or find equivalent software for Windows XP (which should be possible, Keynote is clever but technically it isn't that big a deal--doing alpha blends is a function of the hardware not the OS).

Thanks for you candid insights.

Posted by: jdb | Jan 10, 2005 10:53:02 PM

Like many of you, I became a 'Switcher'. The year was 1989. Having had worked on PCs since '83, there was a resistance to the Mac. At the core of my inertia was what now holds legions of you from moving to the obvious, phenomenally superior user computing platform of the Macintosh:

Fear.

Fear and all of its manifestations: fear of the unknown, fear of something different; fear of going against the standard; fear of loss of investment; fear of loss of control; fear of your boss/your mgmt/your company; and the deeper fear of realizing one has wasted countless hours of productivity & creativity & one’s own humanity working on a two-bit knockoff of a system, hyper-viral at that, delivered by a person who didn’t want to jazz you with a human-centric computing experience but instead own you with his geek-centric computing orthodoxy.

Well, at this point, all of you still-Windows users have nothing to fear but fear itself. So it then becomes just a matter of the ‘leap’. And later this morning, Steve Jobs will make the distance of that Leap oh-oh-so-smaller.

Just remember this: don’t kick yourself for all the loss in the past; just enjoy the ease and promise of your computing future on that new Powerbook or iBook that is waiting for you at the other end of your Leap.


Lefty clear

Posted by: Ranger Lefty | Jan 11, 2005 3:29:37 AM

I switched back in the MacOS 9 days. All Mac users I knew were very enthusiastic about it. I hated Windows 98. But I hated MacOS even more. It crashed constantly, was generally very unstable (and I had great tech support people around me to help, so it was not my setup). I know that OSX is a huge improvement, but my point is that even back then everybody raved about how cool macs were, even though the OS really sucked except for the interface. I think it was a great example of cognitive dissonance.

I now am a happy Windows XP Pro user. I never experience crashes, and most things just work. I do not think it is that common or normal to have many problems with Windows XP. Like MacOS, Windows too, has improved.

(KeyNote sure looks very cool though, I can imagine wanting to switch because of that)

Posted by: Lotte | Jan 11, 2005 5:29:59 AM

Oops! I turned on the comment section for the Mac Quest article.

Posted by: Michael Hyatt | Jan 11, 2005 6:34:29 AM

I noticed a couple of people recommending iBooks as being suitable for your needs but if you're a serious presenter I'm inclined to disagree. While both machines can do video out the iBook can only (officially -- there's a hack but it might break something so it's not worth it on a business machine, IMO) do mirroring, where the projector or external monitor shows the same thing the screen does. The PowerBooks can do spanning, however, where each screen is a seperate display.

The reason this would be of interest to you is because Keynote has the ability to use one display for showing the slides and another for showing you a smaller version of the current slide as well as your slide notes. I always thought it looked rather odd to have a $2000 laptop and be fumbling with a $0.50 stack of 3x5 cards or a printout of your notes and this solves that problem extremely elegantly.

Regardless of which notebook you may end up getting, make sure it has BlueTooth. There's a little tool called Salling Clicker that allows you to use your BlueTooth phone as a remote control for Keynote, among other things. Having seen this done it looks so unbelievably classy it's mind blowing. A friend of mine uses his phone to control his presentations and he never takes it out of his pocket -- he's had people ask if he'd just rehearsed it enough to have the timing that closely nailed.

It's tools like that, Quicksilver and Tinderbox (a GTD junkie's dream) that make Mac OS X such an innovative, exciting and downright fun platform to use.

Posted by: Jeff Abbott | Jan 11, 2005 6:46:46 AM

Don't believe the hype. Keynote looks nice, but honestly, beyond the eye-candy, does it fundamentally help you deliver your message better? I am a long time Mac and PC user. My first Mac was a Mac+ running some version of OS6, IIRC. In the early days, the Mac UI was infinitely superior to Windows (3.1). Time has changed that. The UI standards that made the Mac great have been forgotten in OS-X. The reliability in OS-X stems from technology that Windows NT has always had - preemptive multitasking, protected memory, hardware abstraction. I have both Macs and PCs. I dramatically prefer Windows 2000 or XP to any version of Mac OS. The Mac *looks* really nice. It doesn't operate as well as it looks. If you really want to try it out, then by all means, do it! But don't expect it to be some sort of revelation. Personally, I'm extremely disappointed in OS-X and Apple in general. They continue to create highly proprietary and high-cost solutions. Yeah, they are very cool looking. But at the end of the day, I can get more work done on a Windows NT-family (NT4, 2000, XP, 2003) box than on any Mac. Hope that helps.

Posted by: MacPC | Jan 11, 2005 1:17:44 PM

If you liked Keynote before today, you're going to LOVE it when you get your hands on Keynote 2. Go back to Apple's Keynote page at http://www.apple.com/iwork/keynote/ and reload.

Especially, look closely at the new Presenter Display (http://www.apple.com/iwork/keynote/presenter.html).

I've always thought Keynote was one of the best products Apple's ever invented. Yes, it actually does make me more productive because it's so dang EASY to use - so easy and such fun, it actually inspires me to do better work. I'm not talking effects and transitions, I'm talking simple things such as images, themes, changing slide masters, making charts and graphs. Easy, easy, easy.

Posted by: Paul W. | Jan 11, 2005 3:07:12 PM

Michael and others,

I commented on your first-time revelation of seeing Keynote in action in my blog, and you are of course not alone in your surprise.

It was my secret weapon in some classes I took (Knowledge Management) which had my Powerpoint lecturers and colleagues going ga-ga. Fortunately, the messages I was delivering were complemented and enhanced by Keynote.

It is more than a presentation tool, but you'll discover that for yourself when you get your hands on it, on a Mac. Scoble's software suggestion requires very high end 3D experience, way out of the league of PPT and KN users.

I have linked here from my blog, and offered some thoughts on Keynote 2 as well: ; scroll down to see my reference to your site.

Posted by: Les Posen | Jan 11, 2005 11:08:48 PM

hey mike - you know i faced (and still face) the exact same situation . i suggested my sister buy an iBook when replacing her sony vaio for two reasons:

- she was causing me much misery with constant troubleshooting requests that i hoped the mac (from reputation) would eliminate.
- i REALLY REALLY wanted to get my hands on a iBook but was not willing to forgo the investment I had made in the Windows platform (dammit!)

i also wonder why apple has not broken into the tablet market. they may have been scarred by that newton (i think it was called?) thing

i also bought into groove.net's collaboration offerings recently (That would warrant a article of its own) and they unfortunately do not offer a mac version. this, actually, may have gotten me to move had it been available given that it can replicate workspaces on any device you have seamlessly, automatically and simultaneously (up to 5 devices per user license!) over a net connection.

i am still looking for what would allow me to indulge my (no longer secret) passion for macs. let me know if you find a fix...

Posted by: hamad | Jan 13, 2005 1:09:35 AM

I've been using Keynote since it came out and it is always fun presenting with it. Keynote produces onscreen output that is distinctively better quality than PowerPoint.

One point you really have to watch using Keynote so that your audience don't start focussing on how you did that rather than you message.

I present weekly and throw the cube in evry now and then. The first time I present to an 'it savvy' crowd it never fails to get someone in the audience to say SHIT!

Posted by: James Ryan | Jan 18, 2005 4:09:44 PM

Hello Michael,

as an enhancer of your presentations on a PC platform maybe you'll find Articulate usefull (www.articulate.com). It is a Power Point plugin and one of the most natable features is thae psobility to add flash movies to your slides

Posted by: Razvan Antonescu | Jan 31, 2005 6:25:18 AM

OpenOffice Impress is free, so it can't hurt to try.

http://www.openoffice.org
http://ooextras.sourceforge.net/downloads/simpress/

Posted by: David N. | Jan 18, 2006 11:54:49 PM

I've never used Quicksilver, but from what I've read, I think that "Launchy" does something similar in Windows.

http://www.launchy.net/

Posted by: Ian Wang | Dec 30, 2006 9:22:44 PM

Post a comment